Publications & Reports

Cost-effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: A systematic review.

Vogel JP, Wilson AN, Scott N, Widmer M, Althabe F, Oladapo OT
Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.


BACKGROUND: Uterine tamponade is widely promoted for treating refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), however its cost-effectiveness may vary depending on unit costs and setting. OBJECTIVE: To review available data on cost-effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices when used for PPH treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed and EMBASE were searched (1980 to January 2020), as well as the National Health Services Economic Evaluation database from inception (1995) to March 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies were any type of economic evaluation, or effectiveness studies that provided cost or economic data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed quality. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies using a range of devices (condom catheter, uterine suction devices, Bakri, Inpress, Ellavi) were identified. Cost of condom catheter devices or kits ranged from US$0.64 to US$6, while purpose-designed devices were up to US$400. Two studies that took a health system perspective assessed cost-effectiveness of using uterine balloon tamponade and suggested it was highly cost-effective due to low cost per disability-adjusted life years (DALY) averted, though both used effect estimates from case series. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices was limited and not generalizable. Rigorous economic evaluations based on updated effect estimates are needed.

Link to publisher’s web site


  • Journal: International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
  • Published: 25/09/2020
  • Volume: 151
  • Issue: 3
  • Pagination: 333-340