OBJECTIVE(S): To compare antiretroviral resistance susceptibility testing of patient HIV-1 strains using genotype and phenotype methods.
DESIGN: Eighteen plasma samples with viral load > 2000 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml were randomly selected for testing by both methods. Disease and treatment data were available for all patients.
METHODS: Samples were analysed genotypically using a kit assay (HIV-1 Genotyping Systems, Applied Biosystems), performed by the Clinical Research Laboratory at Macfarlane Burnet Centre for Medical Research. Samples were analysed phenotypically using a rapid phenotypic assay (PhenoSenseTM HIV, ViroLogic), performed by the manufacturer. Results from both methods were interpreted using a defined protocol. Each susceptibility assay was performed and interpreted by individuals unaware of either the clinical data or the results of the other susceptibility assay. Concordance was defined categorically as either the presence of reduced susceptibility (> 2.5-fold change) in the phenotypic assay and resistance associated mutations in the genotypic assay, or the absence of these findings in both assays.
RESULTS: Concordance between phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility testing was 81% for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 91% for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and 90% for protease inhibitors. Complete concordance between phenotype and genotype for all 14 drugs evaluated was observed in three (17%) patient samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility appear to provide similar results. However, interpretation of genotypic results can be complicated, and both methods still require clinical validation.